Higher education reform : now or never / Adriano A. Arcelo [and four others]
Material type:
- LB 2325 .H54 1994

Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
National University - Manila | LRC - Graduate Studies Filipiniana | Gen. Ed - CEAS | FIL LB 2325 .H54 1994 c.2 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | c.2 | Available | NULIB000012539 |
Browsing LRC - Graduate Studies shelves, Shelving location: Filipiniana, Collection: Gen. Ed - CEAS Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available |
![]() |
No cover image available | ||
FIL LB 2157 .A87 2000 Student teaching handbook / | FIL LB 2157 .B45 1992 A Guidebook for the supervision of student teachers / | FIL LB 2325 .H54 1994 c.1 Higher education reform : now or never / | FIL LB 2325 .H54 1994 c.2 Higher education reform : now or never / | FIL LB 2369 .A28 2002 Simplified approach to thesis writing / | FIL LB 2369 .C35 2013 Methods of research and thesis writing / | FIL LB 2369 .H57 2006 Writing a research paper the right way : perfect for beginners and advanced writers with: easy-to-follow strategies proper etiquette in writing / |
I. Will Higher Education Survive The Issues and Options -- II. Higher Education on Trial: the Case for Quality -- III. The Challenge of Student Activism -- IV. College Entrance Testing : A Key to Excellence -- V. Is Graduate Education in the Philippines a Farce? -- VI. When the System Fails -- VII. Shortage Despite Oversupply: the Tragedy of Teacher Education -- VIII. Equity and Excellence: Who Should Foot the Bill?.
The structural and curricular reforms which the education and training system is undergoing today may be attributed to the informed nationwide discussions and debates engendered by the 1990-1992 Congressional Commission on Education (or EDCOM). To be sure, leaders and officials of educational institutions and organizations had been making their own recommendations based on studies of their respective areas of interest. But these had not attracted nor sustained as much national attention as the EDCOM reports did. Nor had Congress been more concerned and focused on education and training matters than when EDCOM and its successor body, the Congressional Oversight Committee on Education (COCED), articulated positions that drew varying responses.
There are no comments on this title.